Ballnat, S. and Gordon, T.F. Goal Selection in Argumentation Processes – A Formal Model of Abduction in Argument Evaluation Structures. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), IOS Press (2010), 51-62.
Bench-Capon, T., and Gordon, T. F. Isomorphism and argumentation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009) (New York, NY, USA, 2009), C. D. Hafner, Ed., ACM Press.
Brewka, Gerhard, and Thomas F. Gordon. "How to Buy a Porsche: An Approach to Defeasible Decision Making ." Working Notes of the AAAI-94 Workshop on Computational Dialectics. Seattle, Washington, 1994. 28-38.
Brewka, Gerhard, Thomas F. Gordon, and Nikos Karacapilidis. "Mediating Systems for Group Decision Making: the Zeno System. " KI-95 Workshop on Computational Dialectics: Models of Argumentation, Negotiation and Decision Making, 1995.
Carneades is a rather general framework for argumentation. Unlike many other approaches, Carneades captures a number of aspects, like proof burdens, proof standards etc., which are of central importance, in particular in legal argu- mentation.
In this paper we show how Carneades argument evaluation structures can be re- constructed as abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs), a recently proposed gener- alization of Dung argumentation frameworks (AFs). This not only provides at least an indirect link between Carneades and AFs, it also allows us to handle arbitrary argument cycles, thus lifting a restriction of Carneades. At the same time it pro- vides strong evidence for the usefulness of ADFs as analytical/semantical tools in argumentation.
Apostolou, D., Babic, F., Bafoutsou, G., Butka, P., Dioudis, S., Mach, M., Macintosh, A., Gordon, T., Halaris, C., Kafentzis, K., Mentzas, G., Paralic, M., Paralic, J., Renton, A., Rosendahl, A., Sabol, T., Schneider, C., Thorleifsdottir, A., and Wimmer, M. (2007). eParticipation: The potential of new and emerging technologies. Technical report, DemoNet – EU IST Network of Excellence..
Glassey, O., Gordon, T., and Pattberg, J. Machbarkeitstudie eines wissenbasierten Rechtsberatungssystems im Kreis Herford . In Effizienz von e-Lösungen in Staat und Gesellschaft; Aktuelle Fragen der Rechtsinformatik (2005), E. Schweighofer, D. Liebwald, S. Augeneder, and T. Menzel, Eds., Boorberg-Verlag, pp. 379–386.
Glassey, O., and Gordon, T. F. Feasibility study for a legal knowledge system in the County of Herford. In Electronic Government — 4th International Conference, EGOV 2005 (Copenhagen, Denmark, August 2005), M. Wimmer, R. Traunmüller, Å. Grönlund, and K. V. Andersen, Eds., Springer-Verlag, pp. 186–197.
Gordon, Thomas F. "The Role of Exceptions in Models of the Law ." Formalisierung im Recht und Ansätze juristischer Expertensysteme. Ed. R. Traunmüller H. Fiedler. Munich, 1986. 52-59.
Gordon, Thomas F. "Oblog-2: A Hybrid Knowledge Representation System for Defeasible Reasoning ." International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Boston, 1987. 231-39.
Gordon, Thomas F. "Some Problems with Prolog as a Knowledge Representation Language for Legal Expert Systems ." Yearbook of Law, Computers & Technology. Ed. C. Arnold. London, 1987. 52-67.
Gordon, Thomas F. "The Importance of Nonmonotonicity for Legal Reasoning ." Expert Systems in Law; Impacts on Legal Theory and Computer Law. Eds. H. Fiedler, F. Haft and R. Traunmüller. Tübingen, 1988. 111-26.
Gordon, Thomas F. The Argument Construction Set – A Constructive Approach to Legal Expert Systems : German Research Institute for Mathematics and Data Processing (GMD), 1988.
Gordon, Thomas F. "Issue Spotting in a System for Searching Interpretation Spaces ." Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 1989. 157-64.
Gordon, Thomas F. "A Theory Construction Approach to Legal Document Assembly ." Expert Systems in Law. Ed. Antonio A. Martino. Amsterdam, 1992. 211-25.
Gordon, Thomas F. "Artificial Intelligence: A Hermeneutic Defense ." Software Development and Reality Construction. Ed. Christiane Floyd and Heinz Züllighoven and Reinhard Budde and Reinhard Keil-Slawik, 1992. 280-90.
Gordon, T. F. The pleadings game; formalizing procedural justice. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. 1993, pp. 10–19.
Gordon, Thomas F. "Computational Dialectics." Computers as Assistants - A New Generation of Support Systems. Ed. Peter Hoschka: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. 186-203.
Gordon, Thomas F., and Nikos Karacapilidis. "The Zeno Argumentation Framework ." Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Melbourne, Austrailia, 1997. 10-18.
Gordon, Thomas F., and Oliver Märker. "Mediation Systems ." Sustainability in the Information Society; 15th International Symposium Informatics for Environment Protection. Eds. Lorenz M. Hilty and Paul W. Gilgen. Zürich: Metropolis Verlag, 2001. 737-42.
Gordon, Thomas F., Angi Voss, Gernot Richter and Oliver Märker. "Zeno: Groupware for Discourses on the Internet." Künstliche Intelligenz 2.1 (2001): 43-45.
Gordon, Thomas F., and Gernot Richter. "Discourse Support Systems for Deliberative Democracy ." eGovernment: State of the Art and Perspectives (EGOV). Eds. Roland Traunmüller and Klaus Lenk. Aix-en-Provence: Springer Verlag, 2002. 248-55.
Gordon, Thomas F., and Oliver Märker. "Mediation Systems ." Neue Medien in Der Konfliktvermittlung - Mit Beispielen Aus Politik Und Wirtschaft. Eds. Oliver Märker and Matthias Trénel. Berlin: Edition Sigma, 2002. 61-84.
Gordon, Thomas F. An Open, Scalable and Distributed Platform for Public Discourse . Informatik 2003. Eds. Klaus Dittrich, et al. Frankfurt am Main: Springer Verlag, 2003. 232-34. Vol. 2.
Gordon, Thomas F. A Use Case Analysis of Legal Knowledge-Based Systems . Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2003). Utrecht: IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2003.
Gordon, Thomas F. On the Need for Standard Document Formats for Egovernance Applications of Legal Knowledge-Based Systems . Workshop on Artificial Intelligence to Support eGovernment. Cambridge, UK, 2003.
Gordon, Thomas F. "eGovernance and its Value for Public Adminsitration." Knowledge-Based Services for the Public Sector. Ed. Donato Malerba. Bonn, 2004.
Gordon, T. F. Artificial intelligence and legal theory at law schools. In Artificial Intelligence and Legal Education (Bologna, Italy, 2005), H. Yoshino, K. D. Ashley, and K. Nitta, Eds., Gedit Edizioni, pp. 53–58.
Gordon, T. F. Information technology for good governance. In French-German Symposium on Governance, Law and Technology (September 2005), D. Bourcier, Ed., University of Paris, pp. 87–95.
Gordon, T. F. Constructing arguments with a computational model of an argumentation scheme for legal rules. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (2007), pp. 117-121.
Carneades is both a mathematical model of argumentation and a soft- ware toolbox providing support for argument evaluation, construction and visualization. Here we present an overview of the current version of the Carneades toolbox, explaining how the tools can be used to support ar- gumentation tasks and providing some technical information about how they have been implemented.
Thomas F. Gordon. Hybrid reasoning with argumentation schemes. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA 08), pages 16–25, Patras, Greece, July 2008. The 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008).
Gordon, T. F., Governatori, G., and Rotolo, A. Rules and norms: Requirements for rule interchange languages in the legal domain. In Rule Representation, Interchange and Reasoning on the Web (Berlin, 5-7 November 2009), G. Governatori, J. Hall, and A. Paschke, Eds., no. 5858 in LNCS, Springer, pp. 282–296.
Gordon, T. F., and Walton, D. The Carneades argumentation framework — using presumptions and exceptions to model critical questions. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 06) (Liverpool, September 2006), P. E. Dunne, Ed.
Gordon, T. F., and Walton, D. Pierson vs. Post revisted — a reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 06) (Liverpool, 2006), P. E. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, Eds., IOS Press.
Gordon, T.F. and Walton, D. A Formal Model of Legal Proof Standards and Burdens. 7th Conference on Argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2010), (2011), 644-655.
Gordon, T. F., and Walton, D. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009) (New York, NY, USA, 2009), C. D. Hafner, Ed., ACM Press.
Grabmair, M., Gordon, T.F., and Walton, D. Probabilistic Semantics for the Carneades Argument Model Using Bayesian Belief Networks. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), IOS Press (2010), 255-266.
Lauritsen, M., and Gordon, T. F. Toward a general theory of document modeling. In 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009) (New York, NY, USA, 2009), C. D. Hafner, Ed., ACM Press.
Macintosh, A., Gordon, T. F., and Renton, A. Providing argument support for e-participation. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6, 1 (2009), 43–59.
Märker, Oliver, et al. "Internet-Based Citizen Participation in the City of Esslingen. Relevance - Moderation - Software ." Corp 2002 - "Who Plans Europe's Future?" Ed. Manfred Schrenk: Technical University of Vienna, 2002.
Schmidt-Belz, Barbara, Thomas F. Gordon, and Hans Voss. "Urban Planning with Geomed - First User Experiences ."Eurocities, 4th European Digital Cities Conference. Salzburg, 1999. 135-38.
Walton, D., and Gordon, T. F. Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence and Law (Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2005), P. E. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon, Eds., IAAIL Workshop Series, Wolf Legal Publishers, pp. 103–111.
